11/14/2023 0 Comments For android instal 90 Tank BattleThe Heer also demanded low complexity and higher reliability (which is why the Leopard 2 hull was proposed).įrance reduced its defence budget in 1981, making a sustainment of the project unlikely. It was agreed that the new tank should have the same firepower and mobility as the Leopard 2, while reaching a higher level of protection by using an autoloader (allowing to reduce the height of the turret and re-invest "freed weight" into armor). In the end an MoU for a second development phase was signed, which did include the option for France to demand a lighter hull at the end of the second phase. West-Germany wanted all concepts to be based on the Leopard 2 hull mainly to reduce costs, but also argued that automotive technology wouldn't evolve enough within the decade to make any difference. France insisted on a weight limit of 50 tonnes, which according to a joint-study was insufficient to reach the protection level both partners had agreed on. It was discovered that ther ewere major disagreements in the requirements of both sides. This first phase was limited to requirement analysis and concept work. In January 1979 and Feburary 1980 two MoUs were signed by the French and the West-German governments for the first phase of the Char 90/Kampfpanzer 90 project. The UK participated in these talks, but already had started work on the MBT 80 program and decided to not join a cooperative development effort. Click to expand.First talks between France, the UK and West-Germany were held in 1977, directly after the end of the FMBT project.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |